Dec
30th

Forget It Ad Fans: Pepsi Won’t Run Super Bowl Ads

Posted by Maureen on December 30, 2009 at 1:13 pm

Ah, the Super Bowl. It’s a time to gather together, eat lots of unhealthy yet incredibly delicious snacks and critique the year’s best and worst ads. And for those who feel like sitting that whole time, I suppose there’s a bit of football you can watch as well (if you’re not getting up in-between ads to refill your snacks and what not).

I have to admit, ever since I can remember I loved to watch the ads that would play during the Super Bowl, then discuss which was the best/worst the next day at school and later, work. Pepsi always seemed to be a contender for one of the best ads every year, which is why it may seem shocking to some that in 2010, they will not run a single ad during the Super Bowl. Not even for a second. Instead, they are choosing to put their advertising dollars towards social media.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Pepsi says it will spend 60% more on online ads in 2010 than it did this year. The article goes on to state that social media is “the best way to reach younger audiences— Pepsi’s primary target—and to keep consumers involved with its brand.”

I concur.

Social media is growing in importance every day. If you consider the number of people who are currently on social networks (billions served), it’s jaw-dropping. But the thing that gets me is how social media presents a way to keep users interacting with your brand, something a 30 second television commercial can’t do.

For example, Pepsi will be launching the Pepsi Refresh Project as their new 2010 social campaign. They will be encouraging people from around the world to propose community projects, and then urging them to vote for their favorites. They’ve already set up a Facebook page for this, which you can see below.

123009_pepsifacebook

On the Facebook page is a link to find out more, which takes you to a Pepsi microsite. So now you’ve had two interactions with the brand. Say you go to the microsite, and watch the video on the homepage. That’s three interactions. Then maybe you decide to see what’s on the blog (four, if you’re still counting). Then you click on the small Twitter logo they provide to tell your followers about Pepsi’s campaign.

Not only have you quadrupled the number of interactions you would have had with this brand if you’d just watched a single three million dollar television commercial, you’ve just become a brand advocate—spreading the word for Pepsi at virtually no cost to them.

And the best part is, social media is the kind of advertising people want right now. So I guess so long Pepsi and your Super Bowl dominance, I’ll be seeing you online.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jan
30th

Super Bowl – Bust Or Buzz?

Posted by Anne on January 30, 2008 at 10:32 am

“Super Bowl advertising is less about the relevance of a message but more about the entertainment quotient,” said Devika Bulchandani, Executive Vice-President Director of strategic planning at the New York office of McCann Erickson. According to Devika, marketers aren’t selling a product; they are creating a brand buzz.

But what about that buzz? Are advertisers getting the biggest bang for their buzz?

super-bowl-buzz-or-bust.jpgWith 93 million viewers, according to Nielsen’s measurement of SuperBowl XLI, advertisers are finding ways to be creative since their competition has the same 30 seconds. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more creative measures expected to appear in this year’s contest to attract the ears and eyes of the American consumer.

Who’s Buying What in Super Bowl XLII?

The range is wide and includes warnings to parents about the danger of teens misusing parents’ prescription drugs from the White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy. Also, Bridgestone Firestone of North America has reserved two spots for tire ads. While the first spot, “Scream,” shows a woman screaming as her car is about to hit a squirrel, the second, “Unexpected Obstacles,” features an unlikely pair – Richard Simmons and Alice Cooper – and a deer.

Capitalizing on the fact that Valentine’s Day is right around the corner, companies like Victoria’s Secret target men and women. Why? The chief marketing officer knows that the Super Bowl is probably the highest-viewed dual-audience vehicle and the perfect target audience.

Would you pay $2.7 million for 30 seconds of air time during the Super Bowl?

That’s the question. Last year, 93.2 million viewers tuned in to the game, which aired on CBS, and marketers paid as much as $2.6 million for a 30-second spot. This year, Fox has gotten some marketers to pay as much as $2.7 million to $3 million per 30 second to appear in the game.

But wait, here you have a collection of customers and their friends; why not throw that $2.7 million at it and watch the bottles fly off the shelves? According to Lisa Haverty, a cognitive scientist at Brain on Brand in Brookline, Massachusetts, who published an article titled, “Don’t Flush Your Ad Down the Super Bowl”:

You might make a cool ad, a memorable ad, an ad beloved by all who behold it, but unless you’ve incorporated some very fundamental cognitive elements, your ad most likely will be attributed to Bud. No one will recall your brand.”

If you compare the cost of a 30-second commercial to an SEO/PPC campaign which is considerably longer than 30 seconds, more like 30 days or 30 weeks, the costs are significantly less! In the search engine optimization world, $2.7 million will not only create a buzz for your company, it will create a campaign that will last through Super Bowl XLII, well into Super Bowl XLIII, and beyond.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jan
25th

Taking TV Advertising Online – The Super Bowl Challenge

Posted by Chip Rice on January 25, 2008 at 9:00 am

Duncan’s post yesterday about the Special K diet and how well Kellogg’s integrated television ads, search efforts and a website – this time in the form of a social community on Yahoo Groups – got me thinking about how companies are starting to become more conscious of the power of integrating their traditional media efforts with online and search marketing.

Seeing as though I work in search marketing, for years I have been disappointed at how many companies just simply drop the ball when it comes to coordinating their traditional marketing efforts with the vast opportunities that present themselves online.

super bowl ads

Lately I have been pleased to see many companies doing a much better job of tying campaigns into a variety of different online efforts. From simply including their domain name in the spot, to encouraging viewers to go online for a special internet-only promotional offer, to launching fairly sophisticated niche sites and viral campaigns; more and more companies seem to be starting to “get it”.

Surely you’ve all seen Burger King’s Whopper Freakout TV ads by now. Whether you’re a loyal Burger King customer, or you try to avoid fast food altogether, you can appreciate these ads.

First of all they’re funny. Second, they aren’t trying to get you to come down to your local franchise and order a Whopper (well, not overtly anyway) – the call to action in these spots is to visit WhopperFreakout.com where you will find more of these advertisements in the form of viral videos.

Also funny, though considerably more strange, Cheetos has launched a campaign consisting of spots urging viewers to visit OrangeUnderground.com and join their movement. This site consists of an initial video message and contains links to YouTube videos of these spots, a “recipe book” (which consists of what are essentially recipes for playing out nasty Cheetos based pranks) as well as a blog – all geared towards getting people to commit “random acts of Cheetos”.

As the Super Bowl rapidly approaches, I’ve been thinking about the synergy of off and online media more and more. It will be interesting to see how many of the companies participating in the largest television advertising event of the year will have their Super Bowl ads supported by online campaigns. Last year was a resounding failure in this regard, with very few companies taking the initiative to coordinate any supporting online materials.

The cost of advertising during the Super Bowl this year has reached $2.7 million for 30 seconds. Paying to ensure you can be found for related searches during and after the big game is a mere pittance by comparison. There is no excuse for not making this investment. The return that can come from engaging your customers will more than pay for itself.

Hopefully this year will be different than last – we’ll all just have to tune in and find out. I know that I’ll not only be watching the game, but I’ll have my laptop handy to see how the advertisers do. While I’ll be interested in each one of the ads, I’ll be looking to Anheuser Busch especially to lead the way – reportedly running ten spots this year.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.