Feb
22nd

Oneupweb : YaBing’s Future Effects On Paid Search Management

Posted by Adam on February 22, 2010 at 11:23 am

No matter which brand catchword you prefer, YaBing!, Microhoo!, BooHoo! or But It’s Not Google Yet (more catchword branding), the deal is done. It’s been approved and implementation has already begun. Microsoft and Yahoo! will team up at an attempt to produce a more profitable search business. Hopefully, this will also mean a better search experience for users.

This deal will affect search marketing on both sites for Search Engine Optimization and Paid Search. Here is some information on the specific changes effecting Paid Search advertisers’ campaign management, advertiser competition,and the implied customer service effects:

Account Management: Customer service greatly effects the ease of account management, but since that’s already been addressed I’ll focus more on the general effects that this merger will have on account management.

Overall, I suspect this partnership will be positive for advertisers, agencies and publishers. Microsoft adCenter’s platform has always been known for producing solid return on investment. The issue has been one of market/search share. Once the partnership implementation is complete, advertisers will need to manage one less account. Unfortunately, this will also increase bidding competition on both domains.

Platform Differences: By now most of the targeting is the same. Both providers have geo-targeting, demographic targeting, content network controls, etc. One of the few major changes will be keyword match types. Google has made the broad/phrase/exact/negative successful and easy to understand. Since Microsoft adCenter currently uses this style of match types, Yahoo! advertiser will soon as well. Good riddance to Yahoo!’s standard and advanced match.

The second positive change that will come of this transition is the death of the Yahoo! ‘bulksheet’. Yahoo! advertisers have craved an AdWords Editor-like application to replace the bulksheet for years. Microsoft has come to the rescue with it’s adCenter Desktop application. Although it’s still in beta and buggy at times, it’s miles ahead of the bulksheet in terms of usability.

One big downside regarding the switch from Yahoo!’s Panama management interface to Microsoft adCenter is that adCenter is buggy. From the management interface to the reports center, results have been known to report inconsistantly. Double and triple checks should become routine for Yahoo! advertisers who are new to Microsoft adCenter.

Customer Service: As a part of the arrangement, Microsoft will be keeping Yahoo!’s customer service staff. I see this as being one of the few great ideas that will come of the deal. I’ve worked with both of these companies managing PPC campaigns for several years now. Yahoo!’s customer service is far superior to Microsoft. To put it more clearly as to the magnitude of difference, I’ll rank the three leaders on a 1-10 scale:

  • Google – 8
  • Yahoo! – 9
  • Bing – 3

Though these opinions are solely my own, I suspect that they cannot be far from the popular opinion.

To be fair to those who work in an outsourced adCenter call center, Yahoo!’s customer service excellence is only partially due to its great people. Yahoo! also has a system in place that supports good service and allows their people to do a great job. Unfortunately, from what I can tell, Microsoft hasn’t provided a proper environment for their service staff in the past.

I can only hope that the environmental challenges Yahoo!’s service staff will encounter with Microsoft do not reduce the great service they’ve provided over the years.

Summary: In short, I’m excited about this deal, even though many of the details are still up in the air. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! still will not be able to truely challenge Google’s dominance in the Paid Search space, but nevertheless, this change should still produce a better sponsored search experience for users of all types.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Aug
3rd

Move Over Twitter

Posted by Luke on August 3, 2009 at 10:16 am

080309_consolidateMove over Twitter. Yahoo! and Microsoft will be saturating the headlines for some time. This combination of technical resources and search technologies could have a significant impact on the digital marketing industry. Such potential brings an endless number of questions; many of which have no answers at this point.

From a paid search perspective, there’s the potential to reach nearly 100% of the search market with two search ad platforms (AdWords, adCenter). No more logging in and out, or working with bulk spreadsheets to update and optimize your Yahoo! accounts. Perhaps Yahoo! can teach adCenter specialists about adjusting minimum bid requirements at the end of the quarter when revenue pace is below projections. Yes, I’m skeptical.

While answers on the paid search side may be a little more direct, answers for developers and SEO specialists are vague and speculative. If I rank well in Bing then I’ll rank well in Yahoo? Are we in danger of losing the Yahoo! Directory or Delicious?

Despite speculation and ambiguity, our friend Rand Fishkin offers up some advice on what we need to know and what actionable steps we can take.

#1) SEO for Bing is Worth Your Optimization Effort
Bing’s algorithm, while certainly an upgrade from Live.com, still has a few noticeable preferences, such as concentration on keyword use in subdomains and root domain names. Bing’s results are, by default, “richer” than those of Yahoo! and Google. Although Yahoo! will be controlling the user interface on their end, it’s likely much of that “richness” will make its way into the Bing results inside Yahoo!. Bing also surfaces only the top 5 results for many queries, meaning a higher concentration of clicks on those top results.

#2) We May Lose Yahoo! Link Data
This change would likely see the rise of more proprietary link indices as well as the breaking of a large number of internal and external tools that rely on Yahoo! for their link data. We may not know for sure for some time to come, but it may make have a substantive impact on the link research landscape.

#3) Bing’s Webmaster Tools Are Important
If you don’t have an account with Bing Webmaster Tools, now is the time. Although not yet as robust as Google’s, Bing WMT is working hard to catch up and even surpass their rivals with features that will prove valuable for webmasters on all platforms. The data you get from Bing WMT will also be important for conducting better organic SEO campaigns on that engine, and seeing how Google & Bing may view your site differently.

#4) Yahoo! & Bing Local Become More Essential
We’re still not 100% sure of the status of local search – according to the ReadWriteWeb piece, Yahoo! may consider this a “consumer service” and not part of core search. However, if Bing is serving up local listings in the search results (as they do now), Bing’s local registration is going to become very important for local businesses. Check out Bing Local and their local listing center in the near future if this impacts you.

#5) Yahoo! Maintains UI Control for their Search Experience
This means that Yahoo!’s results ordering, layout, sidebars and searcher focus may continue to be unique from Bing, thus requiring that SEOs still pay attention to the differences in the two engines and optimize accordingly. It will be tough to know the extent of Bing’s integration until it launches, but there’s a lot of room for variation, which means complexity for SEOs.

#6) Yahoo! Will Become a More Powerful Content Competitor
With Yahoo! out of the core search business, many people, myself included, expect them to focus even more on the content side of the business. That means properties inside Yahoo! News & Media Group are going to get more attention and more investment. If you’re competing with Yahoo!’s content now, that battle may get tougher in the future.

The big takeaway from a digital marketer’s perspective is that Yahoo! pay-per-click advertising platform will eventually disappear and Yahoo! will be replacing its search index with Microsoft’s Bing. Regardless of the agreement, the actual transition and implementation is still some time away.

If you were ignoring your positions in Bing prior to this deal, then tsk-tsk.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jul
30th

Yahoo! & Microsoft – It’s Not What You Think

Posted by Vern on July 30, 2009 at 8:47 am

It’s old news by now. Microsoft and Yahoo! have joined forces in an attempt to counter Google’s dominance of search. Steve Ballmer and Carol Bartz were all smiles during the announcement on Wednesday. But what’s really going on here?

I contend that the deal is not about partnering to battle an adversary. It’s all about bolstering a struggling profit center at Microsoft. And from Yahoo’s perspective, search is a dying technology, time to move on to the next big thing.

Steve Ballmer

Steve Ballmer

Ballmer is a master of business gamesmanship and negotiated a one-sided agreement to buy Yahoo’s search market share. He orchestrated a chain of events over the past year that left Yahoo! with no upfront payment (Bartz’s “boatloads of cash”) and guaranteed income for only a portion of the agreement term. Yahoo! does all the heavy lifting, maintaining a sales force and customer service staff. Bing scales to a size where it can make a significant contribution to Microsoft’s bottom line. Brilliant!

How’d he do it? What’s the best way to stop your competitor from innovating and improving their product? Tell them you want to buy them. Tell them you like what they do, appreciate what they’ve done in the past and want to talk about an acquisition. How long did the off and on buyout/partnership talks go on between Yahoo! and Microsoft? When’s the last time Yahoo! presented anything truly innovative in search marketing? Remember the Panama launch? Seems like forever ago. Yahoo! has coasted ever since, as Ballmer put a deep freeze on Yahoo! R&D by talking deal, all the while developing a pretty darn good search engine.

On the other side of the deal – I have to believe Carol Bartz is clairvoyant. Why on earth would she agree to give up so much for so little? It’s pure speculation on my part, but, maybe she’s seen the future and search isn’t part of her vision. Perhaps she’s looking to get on board the “social” train in a huge way. After all, practically every internet user on the planet touches a Yahoo! property on a daily basis. Does she have a secret master plan to monetize those eyeballs?

The next big hurdle for the deal, the Department of Justice, will certainly push implementation into next year and beyond. It could be two years before we searchers, or the companies for that matter, see any tangible benefit from this union. That’s forever in internet years. In the meantime, Twitter and Facebook continue to grow, capturing the hearts and minds of internet users and advertisers. Will search as we know it in 2009 be relevant in 2011? It’ll be fascinating to watch what happens. And I’ve got a front row seat.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jun
19th

Did Bing Awaken a Sleeping Giant (or: Anybody Want a Peanut)?

Posted by admin on June 19, 2009 at 10:17 am

Since Microsoft launched Bing (their new search engine) several weeks ago, the world of internet search has been inundated with news and opinions about this new venture. Statistical analyses have been showing up in droves, although not everyone’s numbers exactly match up. However, one thing that all the numbers agree on is that Google is still the King.

Google has succeeded for so long in part because no one really presented a legitimate challenge. Yahoo CEO Carol Bartz says out loud that “we are not a search company,” so even with their number two slot they clearly have no interest in taking on the Mountain View colossus. Microsoft’s Live Search never really captured searchers’ imaginations, and the rest are too miniscule to pose any significant threat.

Recently, Microsoft Binged and Decided that the time was right to assume the role of David to Google’s Goliath. A marketing budget estimated in the neighborhood of $80-100 million shows that they’re serious.

What Microsoft may have just done is awaken a sleeping giant. And I don’t mean the friendly “Anybody Want a Peanut” Andre the Giant; I mean the angry, choke Hulk Hogan until young children cry Andre the Giant. 061909_hulk.pngThis isn’t to suggest that Google has been resting on its laurels over the years, but there just didn’t seem to be the immediacy and the urgency that Bing has brought on.

For instance, there’s Google Wave, a “real-time communication platform” that will be unveiled to the public later this year. Google curiously started showing off the service right about the time Bing was set to launch. Surely this was no accident. Also, James Doran of the New York Post reports that Google co-founder Sergey Brin “has assembled a team of top engineers to work on urgent upgrades to his Web service,” and that Brin “is himself leading the team of search-engine specialists in an effort to determine how Bing’s crucial search algorithm differs.”

Should Brin and the rest of Google really be so worried? The early numbers for Bing, whichever you choose to believe, are just that: early. It is still too soon to proclaim any kind of shift in searcher behavior. Many are still just hearing about Bing and the advertising blitz will ensure that more people are at least made aware of it, and many more are still likely to give Bing a try. But will they make a permanent switch? Early reviews of the engine seem mostly positive, but many seem to be viewing Bing as an accompaniment to Google, not a replacement.

Personally I think Google has little to worry about. Their search share is still in a fairly dominant position, and I think that after the newness of Bing wears off, people will go back to old reliable Google. Part of the reason I believe this is that Brin and company are obviously taking the Bing threat seriously, which will no doubt lead to more innovations from Google the Giant.

And where does all of this leave the Pay-Per-Click marketers that use Google, Yahoo, and now Bing to drive sales? Nothing internally changed during the switchover from Live to Bing, but the big difference is that a lot more eyeballs are drifting over towards Bing, and now is the time to capitalize on that. With the potential for more traffic, and in turn, sales, marketers should be looking to increase their presence in Bing and strike while the iron is hot. The buzz around Bing may or may not last, so get everything out of it while you can.

Image: Courtesy of Amazon

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jun
16th

Microsoft Drops the Hammer on Click Fraud

Posted by Nick on June 16, 2009 at 1:48 pm

061609_clickfraud.pngIt looks like Microsoft is taking some action against click fraud, filing its first lawsuit for the crime against three people in Vancouver and a few other unnamed parties.

While the software developer and recent parent to Bing is seeking $750,000 in damages, one of its major reasons for filing the lawsuit is that it wants to be more active on the enforcement side of fraud cases. They want to create a deterrent for would-be participants in click fraud. In a recent NYT article, Tim Cranton, associate general counsel for Microsoft said:

“We think there’s a good place for enforcement, basically to say, ‘You think this is a game, cat and mouse, back and forth. At some point, once we figure out who you are, we’re going to hold you accountable for it, it’s going to be expensive, and we’re going to deter you from doing it because you’re ripping off advertisers and people online.’ “

Whoa. He sounds pretty serious. You hear that scammers? Microsoft click-police are on patrol and out to get you! And why shouldn’t they? The article goes on to say that there are already stiff legal penalties for wire and mail fraud. Why not click fraud? Good point.

This certainly won’t be the last click fraud lawsuit filed by Microsoft, or other search engines for that matter, but it will at least help set a legal precedent.

What does this mean for all those Bing paid ads? It means the streets might be a little safer, at least for those navigating through Microsoft’s neighborhood.

While most, if not all, PPC managers run some sort of click fraud monitoring system already, it’s nice to see the search engines actively pursuing some click-justice on behalf of its users. They’re lending a helping hand to make the online ad space friendlier. It’s anything but a “Problem Solved!” type of situation for PPC managers battling click fraud, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.

Image: 365_299 – Compute this! by Guin’s View

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.