Jan
25th

Food For Thought: Bing Goes “Bam!”?

Posted by Kathryn on January 25, 2010 at 11:35 am

12510_spamA pinch of salt, a little bit of pepper and don’t forget the essence—BAM! Okay, now turn your speakers up and try typing your favorite food, like beets, into a Bing search query. Bing? Well, it’s not quite Emeril, and I guess you didn’t need your speakers on. But, you may have noticed recipes for a Lemon-Basil Beet Salad and a Beet and Apple Soup from Delish.com in the prime SERP real-estate.

Bing is now dishing up recipe results for food searches. This is part of the ongoing battle in the search world to deliver the most “relevant” and “personalized” search results. But is this just a lot of sizzle without the bacon?

From a self-described foodie wannabe, here’s my beef with Bing’s recipe results:

  • Discriminatory tastes. Supposedly Bing selects the most popular recipes from sites like delish.com, MyRecipes.com, and epicurious.com. But what about brussels sprouts? Or Spam? For some reason, not all foods generate recipe results. And before you disregard this omission as a computer algorithm’s personal bias against the small cabbage-like vegetable, try this recipe.
  • Limited options. Sometimes consistency is a good thing. It’s comforting to know that whether you go to New York City or Paris, Kentucky, you can always count on the same steamy burger from your favorite fast food burger joint. But if I go online for a recipe, will Bing always serve up the same four recommendations—or do the results change over time?
  • Quality of recipes. Collaboration and sharing is a good thing (I’m sure Martha would agree). But not all recipes are created equal. User-submitted recipes aren’t always reliable—or safe. Safe-handling of foods like chicken and beef aren’t always described. And under-cooking food, like chicken, can happen if the recipe doesn’t indicate whether or not to use raw or pre-cooked chicken. Of course, Bing doesn’t test their recommended recipes, but they do seem to be generated from credible sources.

No Spam, Just Search
There are different methods for quickly and easily finding recipe ideas. Google doesn’t offer recipe results, but when you enter, say, “chocolate chip cookies,” the search engine’s autofill feature does give you the option to search for “chocolate chip cookie recipes.” Likewise, Bing’s autofill feature also recommends searching for “Spam recipes,” even though this term doesn’t generate recommended recipes on its own.

Search is about helping us, the users, more easily find relevant information. Search engines, like Google and Bing, work relentlessly to deliver results that are both meaningful and satisfying to us. And both of these search engines are smart enough to know that if we blurt out “Parsnips!” we are probably interested in eating parsnips. A search engine is probably better at guessing what you want from a one or two word phrase than your significant other. But are Bing’s recipe recommendations really making our culinary lives better? There is more than one way to cook brussels sprouts and search for a recipe online. And the ongoing evolution of search engines is about giving you what you want, even if that is 101 ways to cook Spam.

As a business, you want to make sure that you can connect with the people that are searching for your product or services. That’s where Oneupweb comes in. We’re like digital marketing chefs, whipping up a unique mix of search, social and creative services. It’s the house special.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Nov
14th

Spam on the Run – Email Spammers Get Shut Down

Posted by Christopher on November 14, 2008 at 2:17 pm

Subject Line: Is it you? Anja here…

Body: I am lonely girl from Eastern Europe who found your email and who is thinking ‘what is not love if not two people be happy and for respect?’

Oh, Anja. I feel it. I do. Because what is not love if not two people be happy and for respect?

What is not love if I’m not sending myself, from my own email address, helpful savings on Cialis? How thoughtful of me! I must know something I don’t know. What is not love if I’m not IMMEDIATELY HELPING a member of Nigerian royalty claim his rightful inheritance?

What is not love? Not love is what dropped like fifty tons of wet cement all over McColo Corp., a web hosting firm based in San Jose, California, as of Tuesday.

After a lengthy investigation into spam-related activities, the Washington Post’s Security Fix contacted McColo’s ISP providers, Global Crossing and Hurricane Electric. After reviewing the overwhelming evidence of super-economy sized spamming, McColo was promptly shut down.

Thus, the factory churning out more spam than Hormel (zing!) grinds to a halt, and a jillion Viagra-laden image-based missives dissolve into simpler particles.

spam by cursedthing
Image: SPAM! by cursedthing

McColo, it is reported, was responsible for 75% of the spam blasted to email addresses world-wide. Say that slowly: seventy-five percent. Holy schmokes, that’s a whole lotta spam. And, in a rare instance of ensuing reality nearly matching expectations, in the days that followed the amount of junk email, globally, dropped by roughly two-thirds. Spam filters worldwide, anthropomorphized, breathe a huge sigh of relief as what was once a seemingly unstoppable onslaught becomes a mere trickle.

“We can handle this,” say the spam filters. “You guys rest easy…”

But should we? As we speak, the throne of the King of Spam sits vacant, but the minions are restless. How long before someone else picks up the gauntlet? The thing about spam is that, even in an age this jaded, it works. I don’t condone it but spam works. People respond. People buy. It’s strafe-bomb marketing. You only get one hit in a million emails? Then send out a trillion. Still not enough? Then send out a trillion every minute. It’s getting blocked? Change the format. Then send out a trillion. Every minute.

Spam is the cockroach of digital communication. For every one you kill, a hundred hatch. After the apocalypse all there’s going to be left are cockroaches, rats, and email spam. And, just like any other profitable mutation, it has its own beauty. The love letters written by robots. The gut-punch appeals to raw human need. It’s pure marketing, unencumbered by conscience.

But not, apparently, by repercussions.

PS – Please feel free to sing the first part of the title to the tune of “Band on the Run” by either Paul McCartney and Wings or the Foo Fighters (your choice). I did.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Oct
26th

Splogs: The New Badness

Posted by admin on October 26, 2005 at 1:46 pm

His specialty is writing engaging copy for client web sites, but Oneupweb content architect Christopher Carlson has been exploring the whole SEO landscape. Here’s what Christopher had to say about one particular blight:

Ah, will the horrors of bad SEO never cease?

Doing a search using, say, Google’s Blog Search brings forth a number of valid results but, sprinkled liberally among the valid results are, inevitably, a number of “blogs” chock-full of, well, spam. Indeed, a recent search led me to the discovery of the most horrifying URL I’ve ever seen; I won’t post it, but here’s a reasonable (yet truncated) simulacrum:

http://www.product-keyword-productkeyword-keywordproduct
keywordproductkeywordproduct-yougetthepicture.freeblog.com.

And then, of course, the “blog” itself was nothing but keywords and links. For an entire page.

Hence, “splog.” An unusually ugly word for ugly SEO used on blogs.

Here’s a question: does anyone actually think this does anything for their own or their client’s site? One of the first rules of marketing (a term with which SEOs should be familiar, as marketing should be a major concern) is don’t irritate your potential customer to the point of revulsion. Putting your name in someone’s face repeatedly with absolutely no accompanying content is no way to build brand equity.

You might get a slightly better Google PageRank, but what good is that if you’ve spent no time on your content (and trust me, these sites haven’t)? People visit, don’t get what they want, buy nothing, and never come back again.

To be fair, Google Blog Search, and blog search in general, is still in relative infancy. The fact that these “blogs” are getting good search positions at all, when to even the casual observer they’re an abomination akin to email spam (h3rb@l V1@gr@, anyone?), points to a deficiency that should be addressed.

It’s true: there are no real shortcuts. Natural, organic results take time. But a combination of an attractive, useful site and well-written, informative content will go far toward building the natural links (maybe even in legitimate blogs) both you and Google are looking for. A better PageRank and better search placement will come, and with them will come your customers.

And they’ll stay.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.