Putting Mahalo to the Test
Posted by andrew on October 16, 2007 at 01:48 PM
At the start of June, Jason Calcanis launched his newest project, Mahalo. The algorithm-free, human-guided search engine certainly represents a break from what we’ve come to expect in the industry. And, with four months under its belt, I figured it was time to put Mahalo to the test.
I know I’m a week late, but I also know that Radiohead’s new album is available for download. And, figuring that I can’t beat the price, I’d like to download it. Sadly, though, I can’t remember the album title.
So, a simple search at Mahalo.com – "radiohead":
(Click image to enlarge)
And it seems that the engine is reading my mind. The band name, big, blue, and bold, and, directly below it, a link to New Radiohead Album. Just what I’m looking for! So I click the link.
And, there it is, in the right corner, all the information I need, in a shaded "Guide Note" box. The record's called In Rainbows, and I can’t wait to get my virtual hands on it. How do I now recall that it’s called In Rainbows? The simple guide note, of course, right at the top of my “New Radiohead Album‎ search:
(Click image to enlarge)
You’ll notice, though, that Mahalo’s a little misleading here. Mahalo tells me that In Rainbows will be released beginning October 10. Thankfully, I know that happened a week ago, and this bit of mistaken tense doesn’t deter me.
Figuring that I just want the album already, I click on the title within the Guide Note. Sadly, still no download...just a new tracklisting:
(Click image to enlarge)
This is good information, I guess, but ultimately gets me no closer to the record.
So, I shift my eyes back left. Suggestions to click on links for Radiohead - but that’s where I started – or In Rainbows Review - but I don’t want those. I just want the album already.
My eyes scroll down. Seven "recent" headlines, the earliest coming September 30. Nothing I’m looking for here.
So I look down further and, finally, I find a link to InRainbows.com and, finally, what I’m looking for.
The verdict on Mahalo: Pretty unsatisfying. In my mind, a quick-developing, semi-breaking entertainment story is where an engine such as Mahalo should thrive. But the engine essentially misled me through the process. In fact, had I just clicked on the band’s official site, right atop The Mahalo Top 7, I would have gotten the album. Instead, though, I followed the engine’s seemingly convenient lead, and was left in a lurch.
Mahalo for nothing, Jason.
Comments (2)
Posted on October 17, 2007 08:18 AM
Thanks for reading, Lon.
I hadn't used the service before, and just clicked where my eyes took me. I see the new link on the In Rainbows page - it looks great.
It's tough to break user habits, but I know I'm pulling for Mahalo to at least make a dent in the search monopoly.
Thanks again for reading.















Posted on October 16, 2007 06:41 PM
Andrew -
Hey, Lon from Mahalo here. I'm the guide that built most of these Radiohead pages.
Thanks very much for checking out the site and for your comments. You're absolutely correct that the most vital link on any of these pages would by inrainbows.com, the site where the album can actually be downloaded.
We typically use the Guide Note on the right side of the page for background information, placing the most essential links on the left, but in this case I can definitely see how a visitor could get confused or lost.
I have already changed around the organization of our "In Rainbows" page to make things more clear, but just wanted to stop by here and say thanks for the heads-up! This kind of feedback is exactly what we need to continue refining our service and figuring out new ways to help our users.
Lon