Jun
30th

Helpful Advice to Pay-Per-Click Engines

Posted by Chris on June 30, 2006 at 8:30 am

Listen up pay-per-click engines, PICK A REPORT FORMAT AND STICK TO IT!

As I write this I am rewriting the code that I wrote two weeks ago to parse a certain ppc engines report format. Why am I doing this you might ask? Well it turns out that the report format of the moment is completely and totally different then last weeks format. We aren’t talking about small changes that I could have accounted for with a regex here or a regex there, we’re talking wholesale brand spankin’ new format!

How hard is it to export some spend data in a consistent format? Seriously, are you trying to make it harder on us to show our customers what they are spending their money on (keeping in mind, that that money is going to you)?

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jun
29th

Trend-spotting: The New Face of the Web

Posted by admin on June 29, 2006 at 11:55 am

Web 2.0 is the new black, rounded corners are the new complimentary accessory, drop shadows are a part of the status quo, and you’d better not wear a bevel before Labor Day.

Unlike real-life, looking good online is simple: keep the page layout clean using only a few columns, sprinkle some pictures around and follow a few design clichés. That’s right, think inside the box. Find common elements around the web and emulate them. Be trendy. The more familiar a page feels, the happier the user is going to be.

Common design clichés include:

  • Rounded Corners

  • Jelly / Glassy Effects

  • Drop Shadows

  • Gradient Backgrounds

Look around the web! Just about every blog, portal, online brochure, portfolio, and user interface now uses one or more of these clichés—even Google (drop shadow on their logo). The jelly/glassy button effect gets my vote for the most over-used web trend of the new millennium.

Employing one or more of these clichés is all it takes to give your users that warm, fuzzy feeling. Couple these with a simplistic layout and your website’s design will be very, very well received by just about everyone.

Why? Where do these clichés come from? The simple answer is that we all have operating systems that employ these effects and we’ve gotten comfortable with them. Mac users, for example, expect buttons to look like Mrs. Butterworths got a blueberry infection and sneezed Smuckers onto the page (jelly button). The not-so-simple answer is that as creatures of habit (humans) we’d like to use an interface designed to emulate real-life—simulating texture and depth using only two dimensions.

Bottom line: don’t abandon creativity completely, just contain it a bit when you’re designing for the web and don’t be scared to follow convention. Remember that someone has to create these clichés in the first place, just be careful.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jun
28th

Microsoft Says Google is for Girls

Posted by admin on June 28, 2006 at 1:30 pm

As a programmer, I do what I can to keep up-to-date with all the hip and happening developments in technology. That is why I was excited
Monday, when news leaked out that Microsoft had released a
new tool in its AdCenter Labs.
The tool allows marketers to predict visitor demographics using sample data from Microsoft itself.

Excited about the new tool, I started playing around! Searches for
‘perl’, a programming language that we use for most of our development
here at Oneupweb, yields a distribution of 72% male and 28% female
searchers, with a 36% chance that the searcher is between 25 and 34.

So far, so good; the AdCenter numbers mesh well with my empirical knowledge
of other perl users both in and out of house.

I run another test, this time for ‘baby names’ (one of MSN’s recommendations).
Once again the results strongly line up with what I’d expect – 76% female, and 71%
between 18 and 34 years old.

At this point I’m starting to get that warm fuzzy feeling that a
programmer gets when he encounters a project that’s been crossing its
T’s and dotting its I’s properly.

So I do some more tests just for the fun of it:

  • ‘Nintendo DS’ 56% Female, 37% 35-49
  • ‘SEO’ 62% Male, 30% 35-49

That’s all pretty interesting, so I goof off just a bit more
before putting my nose back to ye old grindstone. I click the little
‘URL’ button, and enter ‘http://www.google.com’ and get a bit of a
suprise: apparently 100% of the people searching for Google’s URL are
female and between the ages of 25-34.

Now, I’d understand it if the percentage was more like 60 or 75%, but 100%?
It seems a bit, umm, manufactured.

Granted, Microsoft does have a little disclaimer at the bottom of the
page saying that this is still just a proof of concept, and that MSN
isn’t sharing the size of its sample data. So it might well be that
in MSN’s sample space only one or two people actually searched for its
competitor’s search engine, or perhaps the tool isn’t quite ready for prime time
yet; I certainly don’t know.

I do know that I will have to check back after Microsoft has had some time
to apply some more polish, because this could be a very useful tool, someday.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jun
27th

Ask.com, MSN, Yahoo! & The National Cherry Festival

Posted by Duncan on June 27, 2006 at 8:03 am

Each year the National Cherry Festival hits Traverse City, Michigan in the first week of July. Cherry Fest (local jargon) brings a series of challenges with it. You can participate in a variety of fun and unique challenges like the cherry spitting contest and sand castle building contest, or team events punctuated by the bed race and the milk jug boat regatta.

So why not bring another challenge to the Cherry Festival? I announce the Cherry Fest Local Search Engine Challenge. I’ll be the only judge, and I’ll make the rules as I go. Let’s see what the local search engines can tell us.

Only 3 of the 4 titans of search currently provide a local option on their homepages, so we’ll be talking about Ask.com, MSN, and Yahoo!

Over at Ask.com I clicked the local link on the right navigation. Then I entered my the word festival in the business/service search box. After that I listed my local Traverse City zip code of 49686. I was given a single listing that said National Cherry Festival. Only one listing? Hmmm, could there be other festivals in my zip code? I clicked the link expecting to go to the official site for Cherry Fest. Instead I was taken to City Search. Back on the Ask.com results page they did provide a map in case I wasn’t sure where the Fest was. They showed it down at the Open Space by the Bay. Works for me. Overall, nice job Ask.com. I like the clean straight-to-the-point results. Ask.com wasn’t too busied by ads either.

I pointed my Firefox browser next to Yahoo.com. I clicked the local link on the homepage and then entered festival in the business/services box and typed the same zip code I used at Ask.com. Kablammo. Ads galore. I received ten numbered natural results surround by Yahoo! Search Marketing ads. The map on the left side of the page was crowded with markers for each of the numbered listings. After the sponsored links there was a listing for National Cherry Festival. This listing itself was surrounded by a plethora of links. I clicked the largest one and it showed me that the festival is on the intersection of Sixth Street and Union. Hmmm, I guess you’d find your way into the festival if you showed up at that address, but no local would point you there as a first answer. Yahoo did give several other useful results, most in the restaurant arena. Good. You can get pretty hungry at Cherry Fest. Yahoo’s results were a little busy, but once you dig in they worked. I even found a link to the official Cherry Festival site.

Finally we visit our old pal MSN.com. I clicked the local link off the homepage. The next page that came up already knew I was in Traverse City. Nice. The search box simply asks the word What. This is a departure from the previous two engines I reviewed. They were essentially the same in their initial presentation. I typed in the word festival to stay consistent. Then I clicked the green button that said local. I received some unobtrusive ads at the top of the page. There was a nice list of results down the left side of the page. MSN also returned a Cherry Fest link as its top listing. Additionally, MSN handed me links to 4 other festivals within a 60 mile radius. I hadn’t even heard of two of them. This is good stuff. Only MSN showed me any festival listing other than the Cherry Festival. Anyone who knows northern Michigan knows that during the summer festivals abound. Smart MSN. Smart. I clicked the top link and was again given a map with the Sixth street address. Come on. Everyone knows the real Cherry Festival takes place in the beer tent, ahem, I mean beverage pavilion, down by the bay.

Well this concludes my Cherry Festival Local Search Engine Challenge. The winner is MSN. They gave me the best local search results for my single word festival. I never said I only wanted Cherry Fest information. The other local search engines just didn’t have enough else to offer. Do your own local search challenge sometime.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.
Jun
26th

Soothe Purchase Paranoia with Smart Site Security

Posted by Christopher on June 26, 2006 at 11:42 am

During a darker period in my life I held a Customer Service position in the call center of an antivirus software provider.

While the benefits of my position were few (time spent in the bathroom was included in call metrics, analyzed by a Quality Assurance Group, and discussed during performance reviews – I’m serious) I was frequently exposed to the fragile psyche of the American computer user.

The 90 to 120 calls I answered each day translated into a beautiful rainbow of neuroses that constitutes the mass mind of our nation’s computer owners/operators.

While I can produce no statistical data, I can infer from experience that a marked percentage of people using computers are terrified. Terrified of viruses. Of “destroying” their computers by hitting the wrong key. Of the Internet in general.

Being trapped in a state of blind terror, they develop a mythological concept of computers and computer safety that approaches religious fervor.

For a while, the myth of the computer virus that actually caused your hard drive to catch fire was popular. Were I a social psychologist, one not attempting to quell user paranoia while maintaining an acceptable call length average, I’d have been fascinated.

A personal favorite was the man who was convinced that computer viruses could travel through his new computer’s power cord. Therefore, he was hesitant to plug it in and turn it on to load his antivirus software.

Against regulations (I should have sent him to tech support–a toll call) I gave him some advice:

“No, sir; that’s untrue. You can plug in the computer. Further, you can turn it on. Further, there is no way you can get a virus if you’re not connected to the internet or are loading files from an infected computer. When you load your software, you’re going to be safe even when you’re on the web.”

I got him up and running, but severely screwed up my call-length numbers (we were supposed to keep calls under 2.5 minutes; this one took forever).

Then we reached the topic of virus updates, and that, in a year, he’d have to pay for them. To pay for them, he could go online and securely enter his credit card info.

Whoops.

After another ten minutes of sheer speaking-in-tongues panic he essentially stated that there was no way in h-e-doublehockeysticks he’d ever put his credit card number in the computer.

He even asked if he could just give it to me, now, and then get the updates automatically sent to him in a year.

For all he knew, I could have been serving time for check fraud and identity theft, working in an outsourced prison call center. But he was way more comfortable giving me his data than entering it into that infernal machine.

So, my plea to ecommerce site owners is simple: do a little hand holding.

* Make sure your site’s purchase process is completely secure, and that there are no holes in that security, such as duplicate non-SSL-encrypted purchase pages. Take care of your customers’ data as though it’s your own. It’s like a baby, this data.

* Even though some of them will never believe it, let your customers know their personal data is secure – display your SSL certificate proudly and blatantly, and live up to your secure status.

* Remember that there are still people out there who think their computers can cause them physical harm, and that these potential customers are hearing internet horror stories on the news. You’re going to have to do some convincing, but it’ll be worth it.

Now let me tell you about the time a guy fell, somehow smashed his face through his laptop, and insisted I replace all his software for free… Ah, the salad days.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you leave a comment.