New Search Engine Marketing Magazine Just Misses Target
Posted by duncan on May 19, 2006 at 09:41 AM
May 2006 marked the arrival of the first issue of Search Marketing Standard. I pulled my copy from the snail mail box at my home in Traverse City last week. I was quick to start paging through the issue even while I walked up the steps and sidewalk back to my house. Dumping a stack of unwanted credit card offers and local coupon booklets on my kitchen table, I took the magazine to my reading chair to see what it had to offer.
As I began to dig in I found that Search Marketing Standard is a new magazine devoted to the search marketing industry. It comes out of Brooklyn, New York, and the publisher is Boris Mordkich. Current plans are to issue the magazine on a quarterly basis. The mag was a fairly quick read being only 32 pages in length. Many full and half page ads filled the 32 pages leaving less than half of the real estate for articles and product reviews.
Featured articles included information on the biggest myths in search marketing, pay-per-click tactics to consider, an interview with a well known search marketing veteran, and a bid management software tool review. Having been in the search marketing industry over five years myself, I didn't find any new ground breaking information. The articles would however be of interest to marketers that are just learning about this complex industry. I shouldn't be too hard on this first offering as it clearly has value to the beginner.
As I closed the back cover, I decided that I'd give this first issue a rating of 3 out of 4. Between the ads and other graphics there were pictures of no less than 6 bull's-eyes featured in this issue. At work the next day I joked with a colleague who also noticed this right away. We both wondered why so many people feel the need to use the bull's-eye metaphor when trying to sell search marketing services. Well if nothing else it gave me the urge to go throw some darts in the play room at the back of the house.
Comments (5)
Posted on May 19, 2006 02:26 PM
Thanks for the review. It is true, the first issue was a little basic. We will be covering more advanced topics in the second issue. The second issue should be 48-52 pages with more of everything. We also try to keep editorial to ad numbers at 50/50. Feel free to send me any other thoughts, ideas, etc.
Posted on May 19, 2006 07:17 PM
I reviewed the mag on recent flight and I was sad to see so much PPC/Analytics talk and basically zero organic SEO talk.
Posted on April 23, 2007 12:07 AM
Hi Duncan,
Boris Mordkovich from Search Marketing Standard here.
I was just re-reading your comments regarding our first issue and would love to hear what your thoughts regarding our magazine are now.
We published 4 issues already and are releasing the 5th one in mid-May, so I'd love to hear your comments and feedback on the magazine now - compared to the first issue.
Boris
Posted on April 23, 2007 10:18 AM
Hi Boris,
I look forward to receiving the May issue. I'll plan to comment on it in my May or June blog.
Keep up the good work!















Posted on May 19, 2006 11:16 AM
I felt the same way. I'd love to see this pub make it. It would be a great addition to our pool of resources. However, the concepts were very 101. Guys, how about redirecting efforts towards results across networks? Case studies that can help us better communicate our services and value prop to non-Internet clients? Deeper understanding on Google analytics, local search targeting, bulk-sheet creation and use, mobile search? NOT bashing here. Not at all. I know how difficult it is to do what you are doing. I get it. Wanting you to succeed, just need the bar raised content wise. Graphically, nice job! I look forward to issue 2.