Jan
31st

Super Bowl, Super Opportunity

Posted by Tim on January 31, 2005 at 1:57 pm

Super Bowl week is upon us. Known as much for the commercials (if not more) as for the games, this is a big week for many advertisers. Buying just a 30 second spot to show during the game is a huge investment for any company. For some, the expense doesn’t look nearly as large, but $2.4 million is a lot of money for anyone.

I think one of the really interesting things to watch for will be how companies handle the campaigns after the game. I’m curious to see who ties themselves in to an integrated online effort. It’s reasonable to expect many fans of the ads will go looking for more online. Whether they just want to see the ad again, or find out more about it, chances are good the audience will be heading for Google, Yahoo!, or MSN to satisfy their curiosity.

In fact, the apparent target audience for most companies is also the same audience that spends a lot of time online. Advertisers are after 18-45 year olds who can spend money. In fact, a significant portion of the 18-24 year old group says they’ll watch the game just for the commercials (from the Retail Advertising and Marketing Association).

Savvy companies have already set up mini-sites and subdomains to help support the “Super” ads. They’ve taken care to optimize the sites based on lasting memories and obvious tie-ins. They’ve probably even earmarked budget for PPC campaigns to run in the weeks following the game.

Sadly though, and it may be the cynic in me, I expect a lot of companies are going to miss out on the post game opportunity. They’ll have focused solely on their one TV spot and they’ll hope that a single view can leave enough of a name impression to bring visitors on their own.

Maybe it will, but on one of the biggest gambling days of the year, that might be one of the riskiest bets of all.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you
leave a comment.
Jan
28th

Change is Good

Posted by Tim on January 28, 2005 at 4:17 pm

MSN, long working on its own search technology, is in the process of completing a full-scale rollout of the new technology from beta to live service.

Fantastic.

The introduction of a new search index, with such strong backing is very welcome.

Several smaller organizations have introduced their own versions of search engines, but none have the same sort of foundation as MSN. Many of the smaller engines use existing databases, or pull meta data from several sources.

MSN is introducing an entirely new algorithm and database.

Now the million dollar question (drum roll), why does it matter?

Having a new search engine is like being handed a new channel for marketing, at no cost. The search engines seek out content on the web. They find the content, store it, sort it, and rate it. There’s really no need to solicit the engine. The technology exists in order to find sites. As long as a site has been well optimized, has strong content, and solid architecture, MSN should find it on its own.

This provides companies with a broader audience, greater reach, and gives users more and varied results. A win-win all the way around.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you
leave a comment.
Jan
26th

The Scourge of Click Fraud – Part III

Posted by Tim on January 26, 2005 at 9:33 am

Stopping Click Fraud

It’s important for agencies to take an active role in looking for and defending against click fraud. Granted, in an overall marketing/media mix, search may only be a minor percentage of the total budget, but isn’t it still imperative to maximize a client’s spend?

Aside from protecting and maximizing money though, you’ve also got to protect the brand for your clients. Often times, especially with big brands, a search campaign can often be about visibility and brand reinforcement. If you have to bring paid campaigns down because of click fraud, your whole strategy is shot.

Being aware of click fraud isn’t necessarily going to require your undivided attention, so don’t panic. The key to all of it, in fact a crucial component of any search campaign, is tracking. I’ll sing it from the mountains and yell in the valleys, you MUST track performance. In fact, I think you’ll get the same sermon from anyone in the search marketing game. The fact that you can measure countless metrics in a search campaign is one of it’s greatest strengths. If, however, you’re not tracking, then your campaign has serious holes, no matter what the strategy.

The field of conversion analytics tools is wide (disclosure – I’m closely associated with the linked site), varied, and full. Shop around, it won’t be hard to find exactly what you need.

Once tracking is in place, finding and stopping click fraud really isn’t all that difficult. Any good analytics/tracking package will help you see traffic patterns to a site. Pretty quickly, patterns will develop and you’ll have an expectation of an average day. Hopefully you’ll see jumps in traffic based on your marketing efforts. You shouldn’t see huge spikes though. Keep in mind, as I mentioned in an earlier post, a spike is generally very specific.

When you see possible fraud, the first and most important step is to stop bidding on the targeted term(s). This is a minimum step. It may be prudent to put an entire campaign on hold until you can determine the cause. Collect and analyze your traffic from log files. You should be able to see the originating IP address, the time of the visit, and the referring url. From this data, you should be able to pick out the suspicious traffic. When you’ve got a fairly thorough, and well investigated claim, PPC engines are generally very open and responsive about working with you.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you
leave a comment.
Jan
20th

Look! No-handed Vacuuming

Posted by Tim on January 20, 2005 at 9:40 am

The makers of the Roomba robotic vacuum have been making news lately for the great success of a search marketing program.

Hats off to iRobot (the parent company). This is a great example of the power of a carefully crafted and well managed search marketing effort.

AdAge has a nice story about this (free subscription required). I’m not going to excerpt the whole thing here, but I wanted to touch on a few of the key points that I think were most important.

“The 2004 Roomba promotions were supported by a tightly integrated advertising program including heavy TV and radio ads supported by an in-depth product Web site and a much broader search term effort.”

I think this is key. Rather than create a web only campaign in the hopes of creating demand, or having a completely unique web campaign apart from their other efforts, iRobot married all of their marketing efforts to create a seamless message. It’s a great example of how traditional marketing efforts can be complemented perfectly by online & search marketing.

This most recent effort with PPC was actually the second try for the company. Here’s what most struck me,

“The second time around the company bought about 100 search engine keywords and phrases…”

Now, I’m not trying to shoot holes in the theory of having thousands of keywords, portfolios, etc., etc. This is just a shining example of a company finding what’s right for them and understanding that they don’t have to go with the latest trends. In fact, I do believe that for many companies, they will see much greater success with smaller, more refined and targeted campaigns like this.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you
leave a comment.
Jan
19th

The Scourge of Click Fraud – Part II

Posted by Tim on January 19, 2005 at 4:01 pm

With all the recent attention, and since I promised earlier, I thought it was a good time to get into some of the different types of click fraud that appear on PPC campaigns.

Spikes

One of the most primitive and obvious methods show up as huge spikes in traffic. As long as a campaign is managed in a consistent manner, it will likely develop some predictable patterns. You’ll get an idea of how much traffic you’ve got coming and the trick then is to improve conversions. With a spike, you’ll see a huge surge in traffic, generally on a single term and from one provider at a time (e.g.; Google AdWords OR Overture, but not both).

A quick look at some basic traffic logs will show groups of clicks hitting the site, from a single ad, within seconds of each other.

These spikes are easy to point out and with just a little bit of effort, you can compile a report that will usually stand up as sufficient evidence for the engines to thoroughly investigate the account for click fraud.

Topic Spikes

These work much the same way as a normal spike, huge traffic jumps on limited terms. In the case of a Topic Spike though, there is often a news story, Internet rumor, or some other discussion going on that involves your term. Active and aggressive fraudsters will pick up on this and use the timing as an opportunity to assault your campaign. It will be much more difficult to prove the activity wasn’t related to the widespread coverage. That’s what the villians are counting on.

There are still steps to take in order to protect yourself. Don’t run ads on content networks (especially during a news cycle), analyze IPs for patterns. Compare the number of clicks you are recieving to the unique visitors you count on your site.

Perhaps most importantly, don’t be afraid to stop running ads until the storm blows over. Be very honest about your goals and your ability to convert. If all the new traffic is coming from casual searchers, are you sure you can turn them into shoppers? If not, don’t waste resources on them.

The Slow Bleed

This is the most difficult to stop, and can be infuriating, but it doesn’t have to be. A slow bleed occurs over several weeks or even months. Fraudsters, and sometimes competitors, especially on very expensive terms, will slowly click your ad, perhaps only a few times a day, with significant intervals between the clicks, to slowly take money from your account.

You have to realize going in to a campaign that this is a very real possibility. This is just another reason why tracking is so important. You’ve got to be able to determine, quickly, if you are seeing positive returns on your campaign. And that doesn’t have to necessarily mean you are making money at a rate of $5-$1. If you have specific goals in place (sign ups, contact requests, etc.), make sure you are acheiving your marks. If you can’t make your goal, you shouldn’t have your campaigns running. Re-evaluate and seek help if need be.

Impression Fraud

Impression Fraud doesn’t quite fit with click fraud, but it is related. Impression fraud isn’t nearly as prevalent as click fraud, and it’s not as directly damaging. Impression fraud is done by people with lots of extra time on their hands.

Instead of draining a budget, the goal of impression fraud is to artificially damage the credibility of your ad campaign in the eyes of the engine. The major PPC players put strong weight on the Click Through Rate (CTR) of ads, and when ads are shown often with few (or no) clicks, the engines will disable the ads.

The impression fraudsters will work to have your ad displayed several times in an effort to push the CTR below the acceptable threshold, thus keeping you from ever being seen by legitimate prospects. So far, this can almost be seen as more of a nuisance than anything, but techniques are probably becoming more sophisticated everyday.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Socialize This Post

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you
leave a comment.